THE US-CHINA BUSINESS COUNCIL: CHINA
OPERATIONS '99
Foreign Direct Investment
March 4, 1999
China's foreign-investment inflows in 1998 remained stable as increased investment from
the United States and Europe compensated for falling investment from Asia. In 1998 China
utilized $45.6 billion in investment and signed contracts worth $52.1 billion. Faced with
an economic slowdown and preoccupied with domestic reforms, it is unlikely that China will
act to improve investment conditions in 1999 significantly, but rather will tinker at the
margins of existing policies.
The Year in Review
Flat investment growth The economic slowdown and mounting challenges of domestic
reform caused Beijing to further tighten China's investment environment in 1998. As a
result, though foreign direct investment (FDI) did not substantially decline, neither did
it increase in a substantial way at a time when foreign investors were looking for
alternatives to collapsing markets in Asia. Contracted FDI in 1998 increased 2 percent
while utilized investment increased by less than 1 percent.
Changing investment patterns Foreign companies continue to show a preference for
maximizing management control. For a second year, wholly foreign-owned enterprises (WFOEs)
were the favored foreign-investment vehicle and are expected to make up almost half of all
projects in 1998 (see Table 1). WFOEs also attracted the most contracted FDI, 42 percent
of the total, compared to 37 percent for equity joint ventures (EJVs).
Regional composition Investment from Asia continued to account for the majority
of FDI, but its share slipped markedly in 1998 (see Figure 2). Contracted investment from
Asia through the third quarter of 1998 dropped 12 percent. Hong Kong investment, which
still accounts for almost a third of contracted investment in China, was off 4 percent,
while Singaporean and Japanese investment dropped precipitously (see Tables 2 and 3). As
capital flows from other parts of Asia have slowed, North American and European firms have
been increasing their share of investment. Contracted investment from the United States
and Europe is up 46 percent and 64 percent, respectively, in part because of a few
multibillion-dollar deals. The tax-haven Virgin Islands was the source of $4.9 billion, in
contracted investment, up 43 percent. The original source of this money is unclear,
although it is likely that some of it originated from PRC firms. Utilized investment
followed similar patterns.
Figure 2: Composition of Investment
| |
Projects |
Contracted |
FDI |
|
|
|
| % |
1997 |
1998 |
1997 |
1998 |
1997 |
1998 |
| Asia |
76.6 |
73.4 |
63.8 |
54.2 |
75.6 |
68.7 |
| Europe |
5.0 |
5.0 |
8.3 |
12.3 |
9.2 |
10.0 |
| N. Am. |
12.3 |
13.3 |
11.5 |
15.0 |
7.9 |
9.4 |
| Offshore |
2.2 |
3.7 |
11.1 |
15.3 |
4.6 |
8.4 |
| Other |
3.9 |
4.6 |
5.4 |
3.3 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
*Note: Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. |
Investment Trends
Nineteen ninety-eight saw a significant slowdown in the pace of reforms. New
restrictions on the ability to operate in China, including the required re-licensing of
direct sellers and the proposed ban on certain telecom investments, further aggravated
bilateral commercial relations and discouraged investment despite the central government's
expressed desire for it.
- An administrative approach Beijing continued to rely on administrative tools to
control the scope and pace of investment, and made it clear that liberalization will occur
on China's own terms. On January 1, China promulgated the Guiding Catalogue for Foreign
Investment in Industry, replacing a similar list issued in 1995, in an effort to
attract investment in such areas as high technology and agriculture; to deter projects in
less desirable or sensitive areas; and to limit redundant projects approved at the local
level. China also issued a new series of price controls in October to check rising
pharmaceutical costs. The controls threaten to deter investment by forcing firms to sell
at below cost, and fail to address the root cause of high consumer prices, namely the
hospital-based distribution system.
- Re-centralization Beijing moved to recapture investment control from the local
level in certain sectors such as retailing. The State Council called for the re-evaluation
of ventures approved at the provincial level and for the relicensing of direct sellers.
This appears to have been an effort to consolidate central control, discourage alternative
approaches to retailing, and protect domestic industry by strengthening the barrier
against further market gains by foreign retailers.
- Spreading the wealth Beijing gave new priority in 1998 to investment projects in
central and western provinces in agriculture, raw materials, energy, communications, and
environmental sectors. New investment incentives included more liberal approvals of
business scope and foreign equity stake, as well as preferential tax policies. To date,
the statistics show mixed results. While contracted investment in Sichuan, Xinjiang,
Ningxia, Shanxi, and Guizhou was up dramatically in 1998 (although from a decidedly low
base), investment in other interior provinces fell (see Table 3).
- A focus on taxes The central government increased its focus on taxes as a way to
boost revenue and pressured tax departments to raise an additional Yen100 billion ($12
billion) by increasing collection quotas. The December announcement to extend by two years
the grandfather period for value-added tax exemptions for foreign enterprises founded
before 1994 provided some short-term relief for firms already established in China, but
will not help new investments. In another reprieve for FIEs, China's tax authorities
failed to enact proposed consumption taxes on an array of consumer products in 1998. The
debate on increased taxes is far from over, however, and taxation will likely become an
important issue for foreign investors in 1999 and the years ahead. The announcement by the
Minister of Finance of a plan to phase out the preferential tax policies (i.e. refunds for
value-added and consumption taxes) in Economic Development and Trade Zones (EDTZs) will
erode investment incentives for FIEs. This measure highlights likely future uses of tax
policy to refocus investment (in this case, away from over-developed zones) and remove
some of the tax distinctions between foreign and domestic companies.
- Restructuring and reform Government restructuring left many bureaucratic organs
understaffed and unclear about their new responsibilities. As a result, many companies
witnessed a slowdown in government decisionmaking. Beijing's call to sell off small and
medium state-owned enterprises (SOEs) further prompted foreign investors to explore new
opportunities for mergers and acquisitions. Other reform measures included the passage of
the securities law, which could begin to fill in the gaps in China's regulations on
capital markets. The creation of supra-provincial branches of the People's Bank of China
(PBOC) may weaken the influence of local governments on the financial sector. China also
announced the separation of the insurance and securities regulatory functions from the
PBOC. At the same time, central political pressure on banks to continue policy lending to
the state sector raised concerns about the credibility of reforms and the commercial
viability of the banking system over the longer term. Restructuring also left many
underlying systemic issues untouched. For example, CIETAC, China's arbitration body, was
given more authority to hear disputes involving FIEs. But the number of arbitration cases
brought to the highest levels of the US and PRC governments continued to escalate in
response to poor enforcement at the local level.
- Closing foreign-exchange loopholes China's attempts to stanch illegal outflows of
foreign exchange and reinforce renminbi (RMB) stability culminated in a series of notices
and circulars issued by PBOC and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in the fall.
With little advance notification, China increased documentation and procedural
requirements for the handling and release of foreign-exchange payments, creating delays
and increasing expenses for FIEs.
The underlying purpose of these recent circulars, the
systematic elimination of widespread corruption and abuses in the handling of foreign
exchange within China, will ultimately benefit American companies. In the short term,
however, these circulars affect companies' ability to conduct normal business operations.
According to the Council's survey of its members, over 60 percent of the respondents
report that their investments have already been adversely affected by these circulars and
the atmosphere in which they are being carried out. Nearly 50 percent of the companies
have decided as a result of the new regulations to reconsider, delay, or even cancel
intended investments and/or financing involving foreign currency (see China's Foreign
Trade).
- Domestic protectionism Beijing moved to protect domestic industries threatened by
growing international competition. In October, for example, the Ministry of Information
Industry issued "buy local" regulations that set market-share quotas for locally
produced telecommunications equipment, including mobile switches, base stations, and
handsets, and set targets for local content in telecom joint ventures.
- Incremental liberalization Despite an apparent growing awareness of the need to
liberalize services to attract much-needed investment, China's leadership showed again in
1998 that it would liberalize services and other restricted sectors incrementally through
pilot projects. Restrictions on distribution rights remain the top constraint on further
investment. With the exception of some proposed pilot projects, a significant easing of
distribution restrictions is unlikely in the coming year. China continued to inch along in
opening its legal and financial services markets, granting business licenses to 17 new law
firms (including 4 from the United States) and opening Shenzhen to RMB banking, although
geographic, numeric, and business-scope restrictions remain in place.
Looking Ahead to 1999
It will be difficult for China to increase foreign-investment inflows without opening
new sectors to foreign investment, especially services. China is counting on such
increases in 1999, but investment will most likely remain stable or decline slightly.
Asian investment is not expected to rebound significantly, and broad, systemic
liberalization seems unlikely given the pressures against opening exerted by domestic
firms and certain government agencies. Specific project opportunities are likely to
continue in areas defined by the current Catalogue, such as high technology, construction,
and water resources. In largely closed sectors that are experimenting with foreign
participation, such as insurance, banking, and telecommunications, foreign firms are
likely to see limited opportunities.
Other significant developments to look for in 1999 include
- the passage of the pending copyright law, which will bring China's copyright
regime in line with international standards and protect copyright in new areas such as
Internet content;
- the unified contract law, also pending, which is expected to help prepare the
regulatory environment for movement in such areas as E-commerce and intellectual property
rights;
- the implementation of a proposed comment period before the launch of new policies
which, if enacted, will increase the transparency of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and
Economic Cooperation's regulatory process;
- the current draft regulations by the State Development Planning Commission and State
Economic and Trade Commission detailing the inspections and services for which Chinese
government organs can charge FIEs, which if implemented would help establish billing
standards and lessen the burden of illicit fees on FIEs;
- intensification of FIEs' concern over China's lack of preparedness for the year 2000
computer problem, which is expected to cause market disruptions into 2000.
|